• 12,478,323 visits

Be current, Be aware. Receive notificactions when a new article is posted.

On May 14, Senator Ted Cruz (R-TX) gave a speech in support of Congress moving forward with the creation of Space Force as a new branch of the US military. Cruz gave an intriguing perspective on what the proposed new military branch would protect the country from – space pirates!

Cruz said the following in his Space Force speech at a hearing of the Senate Subcommittee on Aviation and Space, which he chairs:

Since the ancient Greeks first put to sea, nations have recognized the necessity of naval forces and maintaining a superior capability to protect waterborne travel and commerce from bad actors. Pirates threaten the open seas, and the same is possible in space. In this same way, I believe we, too, must now recognize the necessity of a space force to defend the nation and to protect space commerce and civil space exploration. 

Cruz’s implicit reference to “space pirates” quickly garnered much internet attention, particularly on Twitter’s “moments” news thread, where tweets of multiple people mocking him appeared. Cruz fired back at Jack Dorsey, creator of Twitter, for not giving equal coverage to his responses:

President Donald’s Trump’s proposed Space Force is currently being debated in the US Congress which is considering legislation officially creating it as a new military branch under the US Air Force.

The Pentagon has come out in support of Space Force being created, despite initial opposition by the Secretary of the Air Force, Heather Wilson, and its Chief of Staff, David Goldfein. Patrick Shanahan, the Acting Secretary of Defense, has been the driving force behind the Pentagon getting behind Trump’s proposal.

A two stage process was outlined by the Pentagon on August 9, 2018, for realizing Trump’s goal. One of the four components in the first stage was was the elevation of the Air Force’s current Space Command into one of the Pentagon’s unified combatant commands. Currently there are ten combatant commands that are at the apex for command and control of different geographical regions and specific functions performed by all branches of the US military.  

On March 27, 2019, John William “Jay” Raymond, a four-star general who is the current head of Air Force Space Command (2016-), was proposed by President Trump to head up the new Space Command.

In his February 19, 2019, Space Policy Directive 4, Trump proposed that legislation be created for the formal establishment of a Space Force as a separate military branch initially placed under the Department of the Air Force. Trump’s desire for a separate Department of the Space Force, would be revisited at a later stage.

Legislation for Space Force was submitted to Congress in February by Secretary Shanahan and is currently being debated in various congressional committees, including Cruz’s. The Space Force legislation is a major test for whether or not the new military branch has enough Congressional support to have its creation passed into law.

While the partisan nature of the current Congress makes any passage of policies proposed by Trump challenging, there is still strong bipartisan support for policies supported by the Pentagon. A letter of support from 43 former Pentagon officials is proving to be very influential in overcoming doubts expressed by members of Congress. The letter states that Space Force will:

… develop military space culture and ethos; recruit, train, educate, promote, and retain scientists, engineers, and warriors with world-class space skills and talent; advocate for space requirements and resources; develop space doctrine and operational art; develop, field, and deliver advanced space capabilities; and steward resources to sustain America’s strategic advantage and preeminence in national security space activities.

Consequently, because Shanahan and other Pentagon officials are committed to the creation of Space Force, it’s very likely that Congress will pass the proposed legislation and authorize its creation.

This finally brings us to Cruz’s indirect reference to “space pirates”. Was this just hyperbole for why Space Force is needed?

In his tweet to Dorsey, Cruz tried to walk back his comment by referring to the capability of major nations such as China to destroy satellites as his real point. However, according to multiple insider sources, the idea of the US having to defend itself against space pirates is not as ridiculous as it appears. There are a number of non-state actors secretly operating in space that do threaten US national interests, and the planet more generally.

One of these sources is rogue special access programs, which operate outside of lawful government control. Former Apollo astronaut Dr. Edgar Mitchell confirmed that the sitting head of intelligence for the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Vice Admiral Tom Wilson, was denied access in 1997 to an Unacknowledged Special Access Program (USAP) involving UFOs.

This incident and many others point to rogue USAPs conducting various advanced aerospace projects that can impact US space operations and Earth installations. These USAPs are loosely controlled by shadowy entities such as the Deep State, which have their own distinct globalist agendas that conflict with nationalist policies.

Now Available on Amazon.com or Exopolitics.org (autographed copies)

An example of existing rogue operations is given in my new book, the US Air Force Secret Space Program: Shifting Extraterrestrial Alliances and Space Force a chapter discusses how the Deep State used its MASER equipped satellites to steer Hurricane Irma against MacDill Air Force Base in retaliation for Air Force Special Ops openly displaying some of its antigravity craft to members of the general public in support of disclosure. The conclusion is that rogue USAPs are a modern day form of space pirates.

We also have the idea of Space Nazis which was proposed by insiders such as William Tompkins who worked for the US Navy during World War II, and said he was part of a Navy espionage program that monitored the Nazi’s flying saucer program. Tompkins asserted that the Germans successfully established a breakaway colony in Antarctica which became a space power over the succeeding decades.

According to Tompkins and other insiders, the Germans have established colonies on Mars, Ceres, and elsewhere in Deep Space, and have developed some of the most advanced aerospace technologies known to humanity. Given their non-state status, the breakaway German Antarctic/Mars colonies may also be considered a modern form of space pirates.

Finally, we have the idea of a transnational corporate network that has developed its own space fleet that operates outside of any national or global institutional authority. According to insiders such as Corey Goode, the Interplanetary Corporate Conglomerate has the most advanced spacecraft in existence as a result of their long-time cooperation with the breakaway German group in Antarctica.

Given their official non-state status, transnational corporate entities such as the Interplanetary Corporate Conglomerate may also be included in the category of space pirates that Cruz was warning the public about.

As the head of a key Congressional subcommittee dealing with space affairs, Cruz may have acquired some inside knowledge of these different non-state actors operating in space outside of any recognized lawful national or global authority.

The problem of “space pirates” is very real and not just hyperbole. Whether by design or accident, Cruz has just pointed out a major reason why Space Force is being created, and is being fast-tracked into existence by the Trump administration.

© Michael E. Salla, Ph.D. Copyright Notice

Further Reading

The April 11 arrest of Julian Assange has resurrected the narrative that emails stored on the Democratic National Committee (DNC) were not hacked by Russia, but leaked by a disenchanted employee, Seth Rich, who wanted to expose how Bernie Sanders was systematically undermined during the 2016 primaries by the DNC. According to this narrative, Rich communicated with Assange and handed over the DNC emails through Wikileaks’ secure online drop box.

Assange first stated in a June 12, 2016, interview that Wikileaks had more of the missing emails from Hillary Clinton’s private email server during her time as Secretary of State: “We have upcoming leaks in relation to Hillary Clinton … We have emails pending publication, that is correct.”

Two days later, the computer security company “Crowdstrike” published a report that the DNC email servers had been hacked by Russia. The mainstream media quickly embraced the Russia hacking narrative to explain why Clinton and DNC emails were in the hands of Wikileaks.

Here’s what the Washington Post’s Ellen Nakashima had to say on June 14, 2016:

Russian government hackers penetrated the computer network of the Democratic National Committee and gained access to the entire database of opposition research on GOP presidential candidate Donald Trump, according to committee officials and security experts who responded to the breach.

However, multiple sources pointed out major problems with Crowdstrike as a competent and impartial investigator into the alleged Russian hacking:

The Nakamura [Nakashima] piece marked the first salvo in the Russian hacking meme. But the claim was not backed up by independently verified forensic evidence—it rested solely on the conclusions of a computer security company—Crowdstrike. The pro-Ukrainian politics of Crowdstrike’s founder, Dmitri Alperovitch, and his strident opposition to Russia cast a pall of bias over the findings of Crowdstrike. No U.S. Federal Law Enforcement official or agency was given access to the DNC servers. Neither the FBI nor Homeland Security were permitted to examine the servers and the alleged evidence of a hack. 

In his 2019 best-selling book, Spygate: The Attempted Sabotage of Donald J. Trump, Dan Bongino, a former Secret Service officer, detailed the multiple flaws in the Crowdstrike investigation and the puzzling decision to deny the FBI access to the allegedly hacked DNC email server.

Almost a month after Assange’s interview that Wikileaks had more Clinton emails and was vetting them for eventual release, Rich was murdered on July 10, 2016, in very strange circumstances. Nearly two weeks later, on July 22, Wikileaks dumped 20,000 DNC emails on its website.

A July 25, 2016, story published in Vox by Timothy Lee covered the Wikileaks DNC dump and found that many showed the DNC favored the Clinton campaign over Bernie Sanders. In November 2017, Donna Brazile, the former chair of the DNC, confirmed that the DNC had systematically supported Clinton over Sanders. Brazile’s admission provides a solid foundation for understanding what motivated Rich to leak to DNC emails to Wikileaks in the first place.  

In an August 2016 Dutch television interview, Assange firmly hinted that Rich’s murder was related to his leaking of DNC emails to Wikileaks:

Assange: Whistleblowers go to significant efforts to get us material and often significant risks. There was a 27-year old that works for the DNC who was shot in the back… murdered.. for unknown reasons as he was walking down the street in Washington.

Host: That was just a robbery wasn’t it?

Assange: No. There’s no finding.

Host: What are you suggesting?

Assange: I am suggesting that our sources take risks and they become concerned to see things occurring like that.

Wikileaks then offered a $20,000 reward for information leading to the conviction of those responsible, fueling the rumors that Rich was Wikileaks source.

Those who claimed that Rich was responsible for the release of the DNC emails were vilified and forced to backtrack on their claims. Here’s how Wikipedia summarized the situation:

Fact-checking websites like PolitiFact.com,[5][8] Snopes.com,[9] and FactCheck.org stated that these theories were false and unfounded.[4] The New York Times, Los Angeles Times, and The Washington Post wrote that the promotion of these conspiracy theories was an example of fake news. [10][11][12]

Influential figures such as Fox News and Sean Hannity were forced through litigation to abandon their investigations into Rich’s murder due to his parents leading the charge condemning “conspiracy theories”.

Rich’s parents condemned the conspiracy theorists and said that these individuals were exploiting their son’s death for political gain, and their spokesperson called the conspiracy theorists “disgusting sociopaths”.

A story published by two Fox News reporters, Malia Zimmerman and Ed Butowsky, in May 2017 was subsequently pulled from the news site and Hannity also stopped covering the story.

Even Bongino’s book, Spygate, failed to mention the Rich connection and what this meant to the whole Russia hacking narrative, which he uncritically endorsed as valid.

After Fox News reporters and Hannity suspended their investigations into Rich leaking the DNC emails, only alternative news sources were willing to investigate the available evidence. Most prominent among them was National Security Agency (NSA) whistleblower, William Binney, who was among the first to conclude that Rich was responsible for the leaking and that Russia was being framed by the Deep State.

Binney, a former Technical Director at the NSA, together with Ray McGovern, a 27 year CIA analyst, wrote on September 20, 2017:

We stand by our main conclusion that the data from the intrusion of July 5, 2016, into the Democratic National Committee’s computers, an intrusion blamed on “Russian hacking,” was not a hack but rather a download/copy onto an external storage device by someone with physical access to the DNC.

After Q Anon publicly emerged in late October 2017, Seth Rich was soon mentioned in several posts alluding to his role as the true source for the Wikileaks DNC email leaks, and that he was murdered as a result by hitmen tied to the MS-13 criminal gang and the Clintons.

The alternative news investigation into Rich’s role in leaking the DNC emails subsequently languished but gained renewed life a year later on October 4, 2018, when the NSA responded to a Freedom of Information request that showed Rich had indeed been communicating with Assange. In their response to a FOIA request filed by attorney Ty Clevenger about information concerning Seth Rich and Julian Assange, the NSA wrote:

Your request has been processed under the provisions of the FOIA. Fifteen documents (32 pages) responsive to your request have been reviewed by this Agency as required by the FOIA and have found to be currently and properly classified in accordance with Executive Order 13526. These documents meet the criteria for classification as set forth in Subparagraph © of Section 1.4 and remains classified TOP SECRET and SECRET.

Since the FOIA request and the NSA response were not released, the NSA’s startling admission received no attention by the mainstream media, and only a few alternative media sources picked up the story. One of these was an April 19, 2019, article by Mark McCarty who cited a blog post published six months earlier (October 23, 2018) that first discussed the NSA FOIA response.

McCarty raised important questions over the precise language used in Clevenger’s FOIA request and what this meant in terms of documents being withheld. In his April 19, 2019, article he pointed out that many of these questions were resolved by Binney in an April 17 interview:

“Ty Clevenger has FOIAed information from NSA asking for any data that involved both Seth Rich and also Julian Assange.

And they responded by saying we’ve got 15 files, 32 pages, but they’re all classified in accordance with executive order 13526 covering classification, and therefore you can’t have them.

That says that NSA has records of communications between Seth Rich and Julian Assange. I mean, that’s the only business that NSA is in — copying communications between people and devices.”

Binney’s interpretation of what the NSA had admitted through FOIA is astounding in its implications. The single issue that has come to dominate analyses of the 2016 election is that Russia hacked the DNC and interfered with the integrity of the US Presidential election by passing this on to Wikileaks.

This spawned the nearly two-year Mueller investigation into Trump’s collusion with Russia, which generated reams of anti-Trump and anti-Russia stories in the mainstream media. Both Trump and Russia were vilified by a hostile media that was anxious to promote the Russia hacking narrative, and ridiculing anyone suggesting that Rich was the true source of the DNC info being released to Wikileaks, not Russia.

The NSA’s admission is the first concrete sign that the Deep State and the mainstream media are about to be exposed for willfully lying and misrepresenting the truth. Assange is all but certain to be extradited to the USA, and will reveal what he knows about Rich and his connection to the DNC email dumps.

While the questioning and extradition of Assange are likely to take an extended period of time, it’s worth emphasizing that the truth is already known to the NSA, which is keeping this classified for the moment. It is not known when and how this information will be released, and whether it will be done through Assange, the NSA or some other process.

Despite knowledge of the Rich and Assange connection, the NSA and its two directors since the DNC hacking – Admiral Mike Rogers (2014-2018) and General Paul Nakasone (2018-) – have done very little to publicly alter the mainstream news narrative that Russia had hacked the DNC servers; and that Rich’s murder was unrelated to the DNC documents that Wikileaks released less than two weeks after his murder.

Why did the NSA stand by and allow the accusations of Russian hacking to grow to the extent that relations with Russia have been severely damaged, economic sanctions imposed, and a two-year long investigation was established into potential collusion between the Trump Presidential Campaign and the Russians?

One answer worth exploring is that the Deep State had much to fear about a potential collaboration between Trump and Putin in revealing many advanced technology secrets possessed by their respective intelligence services; secrets which President John F. Kennedy and Soviet Premier Nikita Khrushchev unsuccessfully attempted to unlock 56 years ago, with tragic consequences for both.

© Michael E. Salla, Ph.D. Copyright Notice

[Note: An expanded audio version of the above article is available on YouTube.]

[Update 4/25/2019 – A May 16, 2017 article published by the Free Thought Project discussed reports about alleged email communications between Julian Assange and Seth Rich provided by a former homicide detective, Rod Wheeler, from confidential FBI sources. A week later, Wheeler’s comments were retracted. It’s important to note that the 2018 NSA FOIA release confirms that the email correspondence did take place and was being tracked by the NSA]

Further Reading

With the stunning collapse of the Trump Russia collusion narrative, many are now beginning to ask why an anti-Russia hysteria was fueled by the mainstream media that drove apart the world’s foremost nuclear powers, and brought them to the brink of direct military confrontation. An explanation lies in the pivotal role Russia has been playing behind the scenes in revealing the truth about visiting extraterrestrial life and secret space programs, and Trump’s desire to collaborate in such a momentous venture.

The dramatic Mueller Report that was released in summary form on March 24 made clear what President Donald Trump has been loudly proclaiming for well over two years. The Russia collusion narrative was a complete hoax that was contrived by Hillary Clinton and the Democratic Party to undermine Trump’s surprising 2016 electoral triumph.

In an article published by The Hill, a former bastion of the Trump Russia collusion narrative, an Emmy award winning investigative journalist, Sharyl Attkisson, has made clear that Trump is owed many apologies by the mainstream media:

We in the media allowed unproven charges and false accusations to dominate the news landscape for more than two years, in a way that was wildly unbalanced and disproportionate to the evidence.

We did a poor job of tracking down leaks of false information. We failed to reasonably weigh the motives of anonymous sources and those claiming to have secret, special evidence of Trump’s “treason.”

As such, we reported a tremendous amount of false information, always to Trump’s detriment.

And when we corrected our mistakes, we often doubled down more than we apologized. We may have been technically wrong on that tiny point, we would acknowledge. But, in the same breath, we would insist that Trump was so obviously guilty of being Russian President Vladimir Putin’s puppet that the technical details hardly mattered.

So, a round of apologies seem in order.

Attkisson goes on to say that emphasis now shifts to questions over how and why this false collusion narrative emerged:

Should we try to learn more about those supposed Russian sources who provided false “intel” contained in the “dossier” against Trump, Page and others? Should we learn how these sources came to the attention of ex-British spy Christopher Steele, who built the dossier and claimed that some of the sources were close to Putin?

When and where did Steele meet with these high-level Russian sources who provided the apparently false information?  

Are these the people who actually took proven, concrete steps to interfere in the 2016 election and sabotage Trump’s presidency, beginning in its earliest days?

Just who conspired to put the “dossier” into the hands of the FBI? Who, within our intel community, dropped the ball on verifying the information and, instead, leaked it to the press and presented it to the FISC as if legitimate?

It can be anticipated that much attention will now focus on the discredited Steele dossier and how it was illegally used by Obama administration officials to attain FISA Court warrants to conduct surveillance operations of key figures in Trump’s Presidential campaign and his incoming administration.

The fallout is likely to be the investigation and prosecution of many former government officials, who knowingly used the discredited dossier as an “insurance policy” to advance their anti-Trump agenda.

According to anonymous group, Q Anon, which is linked to both the Trump administration and U.S. military intelligence, such an investigation has already been underway since November 2017 by John Huber, the US Attorney for Utah, and Michael Horowitz, the Inspector General (IG) of the Department of Justice.

Huber was granted authority by former Attorney General, Jeff Sessions, to use the investigative resources of Horowitz’s IG office to investigate and prosecute those involved in possible crimes that were a matter of concern for different House of Representatives and Senate committees.

Q Anon has said that thousands of sealed indictments have been prepared as Huber and other prosecutors have convened grand juries to hear the evidence provided by former Obama and Trump administration officials. Current estimates are that there are over 80,000 sealed indictments, and that these will be shortly unsealed with joint military and civilian trials.

It’s worth emphasizing that Q Anon has repeatedly referred to the Deep State (aka New World Order) as a global criminal syndicate which engages in Satanic rituals involving child sacrifice, human trafficking, and sex crimes which are used to compromise many government, corporate and media figures. For example, in a November 11, 2017 post, Q Anon wrote:

Eye of Providence.
Follow the bloodlines.
What is the keystone?
Does Satan exist?
Does the ‘thought’ of Satan exist?
Who worships Satan?
What is a cult?
Epstein island.
What is a temple?
What occurs in a temple?
Worship?
Why is the temple on top of a mountain?
How many levels might exist below?
What is the significance of the colors, design and symbol above the dome?
Why is this relevant?
Who are the puppet masters?
Have the puppet masters traveled to this island?
When? How often? Why?
“Vladimir Putin: The New World Order Worships Satan”
Q

While the Russia Trump collusion case can be traced to a Deep State attempt to support Clinton’s failed 2016 Presidential campaign, and even going as far as preventing Trump from being inaugurated, the ultimate purpose appears to have been an effort to sabotage any possibility that Trump would collaborate with President Vladimir Putin in solving a range of complex global issues.

To further explore why Putin’s Russia was being targeted by the Deep State we can begin with famed psychic Edgar Cayce who in 1935 made an extraordinary prophesy that a post-communist Russia would play a central role in liberating the planet from sinister dark forces who he called the “sons of Belial” that has oppressed humanity for centuries:

In Russia there comes the hope of the world, not as that sometimes termed of the Communistic, of the Bolshevistic; no. But freedom, freedom! that each man will live for his fellow man! The principle has been born. It will take years for it to be crystallized, but out of Russia comes again the hope of the world.

New York Times best selling author David Wilcock, who is Cayce’s reincarnation according to a popular 2010 book, has written extensively about the scientific and technological breakthroughs in Russia that have been openly shared with the world after the collapse of communism. In The Source Field Investigations, Wilcock lays out a cogent case for how these breakthroughs have impacted multiple disciplines spanning health, energy, torsion physics, etc.

Furthermore, in a series of articles (see here, here and here), I have showed how the leaders of a post-communist Russia, Presidents Boris Yeltsin, Putin and Dmitri Medvedev, have respectively played critical roles in helping release the truth to emerge about extraterrestrial visitors, and how Russia has been helped by the visitors to bridge the gap with the more technologically developed NATO nations.

There have been a number of insider reports that Russia’s new arsenal of hypersonic weapon systems have been developed with the help of human looking extraterrestrials. Some of these advanced technologies were allegedly used in a clandestine January 2016 battle over Antarctica by Russia participating in an “Earth Alliance” fighting against a transnational corporate space program operated by the Deep State according to secret space program insider, Corey Goode. He had this to say about Russia’s battle with a Satanic New World Order:

Putin and other elements of the “Earth Based Alliance” that make up the BRICS Alliance among others that dove tail together are all working for the common goal of defeating the “Satanic/Luciferian Cabal” that is now in control of the majority of the world and responsible for not only amazing deceptions of his and other countries populations but also some of the most horrific Crimes Against Humanity that have ever taken place in known history. There are many of these crimes that have become more and more known through recent disclosures behind the scenes. This has only caused these groups and people to want to bring down these Secret Earth Government Syndicates now more than ever.

Trump, by virtue of his uncle, John Trump, a former professor of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, has been long aware of incredibly advanced technologies, either created by inventors such as Nikola Tesla, or reverse engineered from retrieved extraterrestrial spacecraft.  These advanced technologies have been developed for highly classified space programs and suppressed from public release for decades.

The possibility that Trump would collaborate with Putin in the disclosure of suppressed technologies, reveal the truth about extraterrestrial visitors, and join a covert global battle against the Deep State, offers a compelling explanation for why the Russia Trump collusion narrative was concocted.

As multiple investigations and criminal trials emerge against former US government officials that illegally used the Steele dossier in ways designed to help the Clinton campaign and prevent Trump from being inaugurated, it’s important not to lose sight of the bigger “exopolitical” picture of why the Deep State was so desperate to use its hidden government assets in such a blatant manner.

If Trump and Putin ultimately go ahead in forging a genuine US Russia alliance, this would not only liberate the planet from Deep State control, but in the process reveal many of the suppressed technologies that can transform humanity and help us become a worthy member of a galactic community.

© Michael E. Salla, Ph.D. Copyright Notice

Further Reading

Famed investigative reporter Bob Woodward wrote a controversial book, Fear: Trump in the White House, based on interviews with hundreds of insiders that have had first-hand experience in the White House. Woodward lays out a case for President Donald Trump being a petty, vindictive, ego-driven chaotic President prone to impulsive decisions that defy good sense and professional advice. What Woodward failed to consider in his scathing critique is the role of the U.S. military in secretly backing Trump’s successful candidacy, and how the many controversies surrounding his decisions were used as a cover to implement a secret plan to dismantle the Deep State, and prosecute key figures in upcoming military trials.

In reading Woodward’s Fear, one thing that becomes clear is that he is very much in favor of the detailed policy making process championed by career diplomats and bureaucrats in approaching domestic and international problems. Complex problems require an elaborate decision-making process involving multiple officials and institutional actors that ultimately develop nuanced solutions that the U.S. bureaucracy implements in a systemic way.

Woodward raises complex national security and trade problems such as Afghanistan, North Korea, NATO, NAFTA, etc., which all require solutions that can survive the bureaucratic give and take that makes up the traditional policy making process. In discussing such issues, Trump is depicted as a bumbling neophyte whose attempts to pull troops out of South Korea and Afghanistan, leave the NATO alliance, renegotiate Free Trade Agreements, impose tariffs on China, etc., are depicted as naïve and foolish.

Throughout the book, Trump is depicted as engaged in multiple pitched battles with his different national security and trade officials on these complex issues, where Rex Tillerson (former Secretary of State), James Mattis (former Secretary of Defense), James Kelly (former Chief of Staff) and Gary Cohn (former Director of National Economic Council) are all depicted as adults trying to rein Trump’s child-like chaotic decision-making style and impulsive policy decisions.

Woodward describes how officials within the White House would go to the extent of becoming saboteurs who would remove documents from Trump’s desk that he had requested different personnel to prepare on a variety of policy issues. Apparently, this even included documents that only needed his signature for action to be taken by his administration. According to Woodward, such internal sabotage was justified given the danger posed by Trump being allowed to move forward with his impulsive ideas.

It’s clear from reading Woodward’s book that he is no fan of Trump, and views him as a bungling amateur unfit for the Presidency. Woodward supports the alleged “spontaneous” resistance by those within the bureaucracy willing to rein in, slow down and even sabotage Trump’s agenda in order to preserve long established policies and alliances.

The omissions and prejudices in Woodward’s book are very revealing. Woodward exposes himself as an establishment figure wanting to push the mainstream media narrative that Trump is a buffoon that by a historic fluke won the Presidency. This is where Woodward and other critics totally miss the boat in understanding Trump and the significance of his Presidency.

There is no way that someone accidently wins the U.S. Presidency, even if they have worked out how to cynically tap into the worst impulses of middle America to win, as liberal progressives deceive themselves into believing when it comes to Trump. U.S. elections are bought and paid for by Deep State forces (aka Cabal/Shadow Government) to ensure that their preferred candidate wins as detailed by researchers such as Daniel Estulin, author of the groundbreaking, The True Story of the Bilderberg Group.  

Hillary Clinton was the candidate the Deep State wanted to win, as exemplified in how she bested Bernie Sanders in the Democratic Primaries despite him being by far the preferred candidate among Democratic primary voters. Polls and voting were rigged to ensure Clinton’s victory.

The same thing was supposed to repeat itself in the Presidential election.  Just as Clinton pulled off an alleged hard-fought victory against Sanders, the Deep State’s plan was to rig polls and the election itself so she would squeak in with the necessary Electoral College votes.

That didn’t happen. Clinton won the popular vote but not the crucial Electoral College, which tells us that something had happened to ensure a clean Presidential election in areas where it counted – key battleground states where the election would be won or lost. Who had the power and authority to ensure a clean election in the battle ground states that would be the only way that Trump could win? The only institutional force able to stand up to the Deep State is the U.S. military.

I have elsewhere described how members of the U.S. military intelligence community approached Trump in 2015 and asked him to run for the Presidency since the level of Deep State corruption had become so bad that a coup d’etat was being seriously considered. during the Obama Administration Trump was told the military would ensure it would be a clean election, and he and his family would be protected from Deep State retaliation. This is what several insider sources claim is what happened, and why Clinton ultimately lost.

The fact that Trump won the Presidency due to covert U.S. military intervention is what Woodward and other Trump critics completely miss in their scathing critiques of Trump and his administration. What’s very revealing in Woodward’s book is the tense relationships and policy differences he describes between Trump and key military officials such as Mattis, Kelly and Joseph Dunford, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff – all former or serving four-star Marine Generals.

If Woodward is correct about the heated debates between Trump and his principal military advisors, it is hard to reconcile this with the claim that Trump was backed by the U.S. military in taking down the Deep State. Were the heated policy debates described by Woodward genuine or a side-show intended to cover up what was really happening behind the scenes with Trump and the military?

For an answer, we can turn to the “Q Anon” or “Q” phenomenon. Q is a group connected to U.S. military intelligence that is secretly advising and protecting Trump. Q’s posts have shown how the U.S military intelligence community is working through Trump to expose and take down the Deep State.

In multiple posts, Q has described how key officials such as Jeff Sessions (former Attorney General), Mattis and Kelly had helped Trump confront the power of the Deep State through a plan. “Trust the plan” is one of the most repeated phrases in Q Anon posts. For example, Q wrote about the plan to take down the Deep State in a September 5, 2018 post (#2096):

Fellow Patriots:
What you are about to learn should not only scare you, but intensify your resolve to take back control [Freedom]. The information that will become public will further demonstrate the criminal & corrupt [pure evil] abuse of power that the Hussein administration undertook in joint efforts w/ domestic and foreign dignitaries. The snowball has begun rolling – there is no stopping it now. D5.
Stay the course and trust the plan.
Protective measures are in place.
Remain BRAVE.
We knew this day would come.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G2qIXXafxCQ
United We Stand (WW).
WWG1WGA.
We FIGHT.
Conspiracy no more.
Q

“The plan” devised by the U.S. military to take down the Deep State is something that dates back many years.  According to David Wilcock, a New York Times Best Seller, he first began hearing about “the plan” from his insider sources as far back as 2009. According to my own insider sources, the plan dates all the way back to the 1950’s when President Eisenhower developed it in response to the infiltration of the U.S. military industrial complex by the Fourth Reich.

One of the best kept secrets of World War II, was that a German colony had been established in Antarctica and South America that developed an advanced space program, built with funds secretly siphoned out of Europe. I discussed this German Antarctic colony in Antarctica’s Hidden History, which lays out its history and covert infiltration of the U.S. military industrial complex.

The plan envisaged by Eisenhower was that when the U.S. military industrial complex had been infiltrated and comprised by the Fourth Reich to the extent that it threatened the future of the Republic and Constitution, the U.S. Marine Corps would be activated and takes steps to rectify the situation.

It’s no coincidence that Dunford began his term on September 25, 2015, around the time Trump was approached by a group of generals to run for the Presidency. During the first two years of his Presidency, Mattis, Kelly and Dunford formed a troika of USMC affiliated officials that worked with Trump on vital national security issues. This is noteworthy given the unique role of the USMC among the military services insofar as it can be used by the President in any way he deems necessary as long as it doesn’t undermine the USMC’s core purpose of being an amphibious fighting force ready to deploy anywhere around the planet.

The USMC were used in a number of ways to intimidate and taken down the Deep State. For example, a powerful message was sent when a number of USMC helicopters allegedly buzzed the CIA’s Headquarters in Langley, Virginia on November 18, 2017. A former FBI agent, Hal Turner, confirmed through credible sources that the helicopters had “buzzed” the CIA HQ for roughly 30 minutes.

By the end of 2018, both Kelly and Mattis had left the Trump administration, and Dunsford is scheduled to leave in October 2019. I believe that their departures are a sign that a critical stage had been reached, and the secret plan developed as far back as the Eisenhower administration, had been put in place and would succeed.

In this regard, Q released a post (#2533) on December 2, 2018:

Q !!mG7VJxZNCI ID: 63896f No.4119614
Dec 2 2018 18:08:31 (EST)

https://twitter.com/BreakingNLive/status/1069340718844522496
Nothing can stop what is coming.
Nothing.
History books.
Q

Like all well executed military intelligence plans, it was important to remove the remaining footprints of the intervention. This I believe is why Kelly and Mattis simultaneously left the Trump administration, with Dunford soon to follow.

If the USMC and the Military Intelligence community has successfully put in operation a secret plan, then what lies ahead? This takes us the 60,000 sealed indictments and military trials that are about to be unleashed on the American public according to Q and multiple sources. The amount of documentary evidence about to be unleashed on the American public detailing the corruption and abuses by current and former Deep State officials will be overwhelming.

According to several sources, the military trials have already begun with the Amendments to the Manual for Courts-Martial going into effect on January 1, 2019, thereby ensuring a smooth legal process for military trials of Deep State officials accused of a range of crimes.

If the above analysis is correct, then one of the main premises in Woodward’s Fear collapses since Trump’s winning the Presidency was no fluke. Covert intervention by the U.S. military intelligence community had occurred in order to ensure a clean 2016 Presidential election.

This ensured a Trump victory where he gave approval to his troika of USMC advisors to implement a secret plan that had been prepared decades ago in the Eisenhower administration to prevent the collapse of the US Republic and Constitution.

If Q and other insider sources are correct, the general public is soon to be awakened to the full extent of corruption employed by the Deep State through the entire spectrum of political, corporate and media levers of power – Woodward’s Fear being in all likelihood a desperate attempt to forestall the inevitable by a prominent Deep State supporter.

© Michael E. Salla, Ph.D. Copyright Notice

Further Reading

Alien Disclosure is a science fiction book based on a real-life event involving President Dwight Eisenhower meeting with an extraterrestrial delegation in February 1954. The author, Allan Kules, weaves a fascinating story of how a UFO researcher gets his hands on a copy of the film taken of the meeting, evades a secret government effort to capture him, and eventually takes it to the United Nations where it is played thereby disclosing the truth to the world.

The book’s plot provides an intriguing example of how full disclosure can be triggered by a positive faction of the secret government providing UFO/exopolitics researchers with leaked documents of real events. This first time this happened occurred in the 1980’s and 1990’s with the leaked Majestic Documents, and could easily happen again with a Wikileaks type release of UFO/extraterrestrial related documents.

In Alien Disclosure, a positive secret government faction arranges for the Eisenhower film to be given to the hero, James Broadhurst, and this group helps him to evade a negative faction. He was chosen because of his firm belief that amnesty would need to be given to all those involved in maintaining the secrecy system.

While on the run, Broadhurst gets to meet with human looking extraterrestrials that have infiltrated Earth society, who are also behind the full disclosure initiative. He also gets to witness some of the advanced technologies used by the secret government such as teleportation, and is taken for a ride on an extraterrestrial spacecraft.  

What I found especially helpful was the way the negative secret government faction was depicted. The villains were not dehumanized as psychopaths on a rampage of destruction as they carried out illegal orders, but as typical government agents with a highly skewed national security belief system that made them view extraterrestrial disclosure as a genuine threat for human society.

This made it easier to understand why amnesty, based on the Truth and Reconciliation model used by countries such as South Africa, could be used in a full disclosure scenario. Amnesty is going to be a controversial topic as the full enormity of what has been kept secret, and how the secrecy system has been ruthlessly enforced for over seven decades is eventually disclosed.

Kules’ book presents the pros and cons of an amnesty policy when it comes to full disclosure, and why amnesty is critical in getting the negative secret government faction to stand down. In our world today, there is little doubt that the advanced technologies possessed by the secret government could cause enormous destruction if unleashed by those backed into a corner with no other option.

Yet, as we are seeing with the QAnon movement, there are over 50,000 sealed indictments that have been issued against Deep State officials. The threat of being subjected to a military trial makes for a big motivator in getting cooperation from them. If QAnon is to be believed, the Deep State is on the verge of collapse, so why would blanket amnesty be necessary for the perpetrators of crimes stretching back decades?

Would a “restorative justice” model based on Truth and Reconciliation be better than a “punitive justice” model in dealing with the complex legal and political issues raised by full disclosure? There are pros and cons with both models.

In the case of the Truth and Reconciliation model used in South Africa, many felt that the truths revealed in the process helped bring closure to the victims and/or their families, while others believed that the perpetrators of atrocious crimes were treated far too leniently, and literally got away with murder.

In the case of the Nuremburg War Crimes, while a few senior Nazi officials were punished, the vast majority escaped punishment since evidence was systematically destroyed, and/or such officials went underground to escape justice.

I believe the answer lies in finding some balance between these two justice models since those responsible for the most egregious crimes should be exposed and punished as occurred at Nuremberg. Yet, it’s clear that in the vast majority of cases, where evidence is lacking, a Truth and Reconciliation process has clear advantages. Furthermore, we the victims of such crimes need to move on into a post-disclosure world and forgiveness appears to be an important rite of passage into what lies ahead.

Kules’ book offers many insights into how the full disclosure process might play out, and how the world will react to the truth about extraterrestrial visitors, release of advanced technologies, and the exposure of those who brutally enforced the secrecy system.

Alien Agenda is a very entertaining read, with lots of fascinating plot turns, and inspires the imagination to think about how full disclosure will happen – something that is vital to how it all eventually unfolds.

On a personal level, I was gratified to see how my own research on the 1954 Eisenhower extraterrestrial meeting inspired Kules to write his book. The meeting was a formative event in world history that has been largely ignored by UFO researchers. The multiple diplomatic meetings Eisenhower had with alien ambassadors throughout his administration has shaped the nature of U.S. and world politics ever since.

One area that Kules’ book didn’t cover, is the existence of a German Secret Space Program operating out of Antarctica, which has morphed over the decades with corporate assistance into something quite sinister that operates in parallel with alien contact. Perhaps this is something he will cover later in his Alien Disclosure Trilogy.

I highly recommend Alien Disclosure: Amnesty as a book well worth reading. It is available on Amazon as a paperback and would make an ideal gift for those interested in science fiction, and have an open mind to the truth about extraterrestrial visitation.

© Michael E. Salla, Ph.D. Copyright Notice

Further Reading

Controversy continues to swirl around Brett Kavanaugh’s confirmation hearing to become a Supreme Court Justice over accusations of sexual impropriety dating back to when he was 17 years of age. Media coverage has been overwhelmingly negative, as evidenced by non-partisan news analysts, thereby raising suspicion that this is more than simply another example of partisan politics, but a Deep State effort to sabotage his candidacy.

Why would the Deep State be targeting Kavanaugh in this way? An answer comes from some of the cases predicted by the military intelligence group Q to soon appear on the Supreme Court calendar. These anticipated cases involved challenges to the legality of upcoming military trials of Deep State officials, and the rights of US citizens being tried in such courts.

On September 5, Q drew readers attention to a question and answer exchange between Kavanaugh and Senator Lindsay Graham during his confirmation hearing. Q related it to an Executive Order issued by Donald Trump on December 21, 2017 declaring a state of national emergency and Deep State panic over its members being subjected to military trials of US citizens.

Q !!mG7VJxZNCI No.192 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tocc8EolxXg&feature=youtu.be
[26:00]
Interesting line of questions?
Normal?
Military Law v. Criminal Law.
Think EO.
Think HRC panic.
Do you believe in coincidences?
You have more than you know.
Q

What lent credence to Q’s prediction was that the Youtube link posted by Q was very quickly blocked making it very difficult for the general public to hear what Kavanaugh and Graham had discussed. In a previous article, the video’s contents were summarized as broadly focusing on the legality of military trials of US citizens deemed to be enemy combatants.

In it, Kavanaugh clearly showed his support for the legality of military trials of civilians during times of war, and his opinion that since the 9/11 attack, the US has remained in a state of war. Essentially, he was endorsing what Q and others have been predicting concerning military trials of Deep State officials based on charges of colluding with the enemy.

Kavanaugh’s position did not gain any mainstream media attention but its implications were very clear for Deep State officials monitoring his confirmation hearings. This helps explain the unprecedented level of negative media coverage of Kavanaugh despite no substantiation of the allegations of sexual impropriety against him.

Thankfully, another video of the Kavanaugh and Graham’s exchange is available thereby allowing analysis of what they were discussing, and exactly what may soon be unfolding with military trials of US citizens accused of colluding with an enemy during a time of war.

The exchange between Graham and Kavanaugh begins at the 2:30:50 mark in the following video:

After a lengthy response by Kavanaugh to the question of “where were you on 911”, the exchange continues as follows:

[Graham] So when somebody says post 9/11 and that we’ve been at war and it’s called the war on terrorism do you generally agree with that concept?

[Kavanaugh] I do Senator because Congress passed the authorization for use of military force which is still in effect and that was passed of course on September 14, 2001 three days later.

Kavanaugh is here declaring that the “Authorization for the Use of Military Force” has the status of a declaration of war by the US Congress, thereby permitting the President to use the military in whatever way necessary against all those implicated in the 9/11 attack:

SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION FOR USE OF UNITED STATES ARMED FORCES.

(a) IN GENERAL.—That the President is authorized to use all necessary and appropriate force against those nations, organizations, or persons he determines planned, authorized, committed, or aided the terrorist attacks that occurred on September 11, 2001, or harbored such organizations or persons, in order to prevent any future acts of international terrorism against the United States by such nations, organizations or persons.

Q has not yet written about the Deep State’s complicity in 9/11, but if it were to emerge that Deep State officials were in any way involved in facilitating or planning the attacks, or assisting parties that conducted the attacks, such officials could be detained and tried under military law as enemy combatants, and/or as colluding with the enemy.

The Graham Kavanaugh exchange continues:

[Graham] Let’s talk about the law and war. Is there a body of law called the law of armed conflict?

[Kavanaugh] There is such a body Senator.

[Graham] Is there a body of law that’s called basic criminal law?

[Kavanaugh] Yes, Senator.

[Graham] Are there differences between those two bodies of law?

 [Kavanaugh] Yes, Senator.

[Graham] From an American citizen’s point of view, do your constitutional rights follow you? If you’re in Paris, does the Fourth Amendment protect you as an American from your own government?

 [Kavanaugh] Yes.

[Graham] So, if you’re in Afghanistan, do your constitutional rights protect you against your own government?

[Kavanaugh] If you’re an American in Afghanistan you have constitutional rights as against the US government…. That’s long settled law.

[Graham] Isn’t there also long settled law, and it goes back to the Eisenstraighter case, I can’t remember the name of it.

[Kavanaugh] Johnson versus Eisentrager.

[Graham] Right, that American citizens who collaborate with the enemy are considered enemy combatants.

[Kavanaugh] They can be.

[Graham] Can be?

[Kavanaugh] They can be, they’re often, they’re sometimes, criminally prosecuted, sometimes treated in the military …

[Graham] Let’s talk about can be, I think the …

[Kavanaugh] Under Supreme Court precedent.

[Graham] Right, from, again there’s a Supreme Court decision that said that American citizens who collaborated with Nazi saboteurs were tried by the military. Is that correct?

[Kavanaugh] That is correct.

[Graham] I think a couple of them were executed.

[Kavanaugh] Yeah

[Graham] So, if anybody doubts there’s a long-standing history in this country that your constitutional rights follow you wherever you go but you don’t have a constitutional right to turn on your own government, collaborate with the enemy of the nation. You’ll be treated differently.

The above exchange is very significant since it confirms that during a time of war, any US citizen that collaborates with the enemy can be tried outside of the normal criminal justice system. Graham is here emphasizing that US citizens that collaborate or attempt to subvert the US government can be subjected to military trials or tribunals, rather than civilian courts. A helpful primer on the differences between military trials, tribunals and civilian trials appears here.

This is very significant when it comes to attempts to subvert the US government during a time of war. Q has repeatedly pointed to the Deep State efforts to subvert the Trump administration, and how this has recently occurred during a “national emergency” as articulated in his December 21, 2017 Executive Order Blocking the Property of Persons Involved in Serious Human Rights Abuse or Corruption:

In post 1926, QAnon explicitly linked Trump’s Executive Order with acts of subversion:

Q !!mG7VJxZNCI No.168
Aug 19 2018 14:05:47 (EST)

[Cause]
Define ‘Subversion’.
The act of subverting : the state of being subverted; especially : a systematic attempt to overthrow or undermine a government or political system by persons working secretly from within?
[Effect]
https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/executive-order-blocking-property-persons-involved-serious-human-rights-abuse-corruption/

Q’s emphasis on subversion during a national emergency as articulated in the Executive Order, is meant to draw the reader’s attention to the fact that those accused of acts of subversion would fall under the jurisdiction of military law and not civilian law.

The exchange between Graham and Kavanaugh asserts that legally the US is still in a state of war due to the 2001 Authorization for the Use of Military Force still being in effect. This means that those parties identified in the Authorization, and/or those violating subsequent national emergencies as identified by the December 21, 2017 Executive Order, can be viewed as colluding with the enemy. Such charges carry very serious penalties when tried in military courts.

The Graham and Kavanaugh exchange would have had a chilling effect on Deep State officials, who would want to ensure that the Supreme Court does not have someone like Kavanaugh confirmed, who would preside over future military trials of them.

The exchange continues between Graham and Kavanaugh as follows:

[Graham] What’s the name of the case if you can recall, that reaffirmed the concept that you could hold one of our own as an enemy combatant if they were engaged in terrorist activities in Afghanistan. Are you familiar with that case?

[Kavanaugh] Hamdi

[Graham] Okay. So the bottom line is on every American citizen you have constitutional rights but you do not have a constitutional right to collaborate with the enemy. There’s a body of law well developed long before 9/11 that understood the difference between basic criminal law and the law of armed conflict. Do you understand those differences?

[Kavanaugh]  I do understand that they’re different bodies of law, of course, Senator.

The Hamdi versus Rumsfeld case showed that there was no dispute over the legality of Hamdi being tried by the US military. The primary question was the extent to which Hamdi retained his due process rights as a U.S. citizen when appearing in a military court:  

Justice O’Connor, joined by The Chief Justice, Justice Kennedy, and Justice Breyer, concluded that although Congress authorized the detention of combatants in the narrow circumstances alleged in this case, due process demands that a citizen held in the United States as an enemy combatant be given a meaningful opportunity to contest the factual basis for that detention before a neutral decisionmaker. Pp. 14—15.

Justice Souter, joined by Justice Ginsburg, concluded that Hamdi’s detention is unauthorized, but joined with the plurality to conclude that on remand Hamdi should have a meaningful opportunity to offer evidence that he is not an enemy combatant. Pp. 2—3, 15.

Essentially, this meant that as a U.S. citizen, Hamdi’s constitutional rights to due process continued even if charged as an enemy combatant. Consequently, U.S. authorities would have to provide sufficient evidence in legal proceedings, but this could occur in either a civilian and/or military trial.

This where what Q went on to say in post 1926, raises the possibility that the military justice system is going to be used against public officials accused of subversion against the Trump Presidential campaign and/or his subsequent administration.

QAnon linked and quoted from Trump’s March 1, “2018 Amendments to the Manual for Courts-Martial”:  

Sec. 12. In accordance with Article 33 of the UCMJ, as amended by section 5204 of the MJA, the Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the Secretary of Homeland Security, will issue nonbinding guidance regarding factors that commanders, convening authorities, staff judge advocates, and judge advocates should take into account when exercising their duties with respect to the disposition of charges and specifications in the interest of justice and discipline under Articles 30 and 34 of the UCMJ. That guidance will take into account, with appropriate consideration of military requirements, the principles contained in official guidance of the Attorney General to attorneys for the Federal Government with respect to the disposition of Federal criminal cases in accordance with the principle of fair and evenhanded administration of Federal criminal law.

QAnon is here saying that the military justice system will work with U.S. Attorneys, such as Utah’s John Huber, in investigating and prosecuting criminal cases brought against individuals accused of subversion and/or linked to a national emergency caused by “serious human rights abuse and corruption around the world” as identified in Trump’s December 21, Executive Order.

This is where the Graham and Kavanaugh’s exchange becomes vitally important to understand since it serves to reinforce the legal reality that the US is still technically in a state of war, and that citizens colluding in some way with enemy forces, can be tried in military courts.

This is where the controversy over Kavanaugh’s confirmation becomes relevant. Studies have shown that media coverage has been highly skewed against him, suggesting a Deep State effort to sabotage his nomination. Indeed, Mike Adams from Natural News directly links the controversy surrounding Kavanaugh to a Deep State effort to prevent the US Supreme Court being ready to hear cases involving the military detention of Deep State officials:

As the documents cited here clearly show, President Trump is planning to carry out mass arrests of deep state traitors, including Andrew McCabe, Peter Strzok, James Comey and even Barack Obama…. The confirmation of Kavanaugh to the U.S. Supreme Court is the key to getting this done in a timely manner, which explains why the deranged Left is going to such outrageous extremes to fabricate false allegations against Kavanaugh and stage coordinated, well-funded protests to try to block the U.S. Senate from confirming him.

Adams goes on to cite some of the same documents discussed previously to make his main claim that President Trump is preparing to announce temporary martial law, where military trials can begin. This provides an answer to the question of whether allegations against Kavanaugh have been deliberately played up by the mainstream media as a means of the Deep State delaying future military detentions and trials of officials.

The deep divisions in US society caused by the Kavanaugh hearings has not only already delayed the selection of a new Supreme Court judge, but could very easily escalate into civil unrest. The consequences could well be a declaration of a temporary state of martial law as predicted by Adams, though as described in an earlier article, this is one of the reasons why Trump was approached to become President by members of the US military wishing to avoid such a drastic action.

Whether Brett Kavanaugh is finally approved or not to sit on the Supreme Court, or withdraws, it is all but certain that in the very near future, the Court will have to preside over the legality of US citizens being tried in military trials for subversion and/or colluding with the enemy based on Trump’s 2017 Executive Order, and/or the 2001 Authorization for the Use of Military Force.

Such trials would lead to many crimes committed by Deep State officials being exposed, including the suppression of secrets, some of which were recently confirmed by Q, concerning highly classified space programs, and the existence of extraterrestrial life.

© Michael E. Salla, Ph.D. Copyright Notice

Further Reading

Donald Trump released a two-part tweet on Friday, September 21, which confirmed that he has been discussing with key US allies the release of unredacted versions of a Foreign Intelligence Surveillance (FISA) Court application filed in June 2017 to renew a permit for the US intelligence community to spy on individuals associated with the Trump administration and his 2016 Presidential campaign. The tweet followed Q posts from September 19 which described panic among key US allies related to the release of the unredacted FISA application.

Trump’s admission follows his Presidential Directive issued on September 17 instructing the Justice Department and the Office of the Director of National Intelligence to declassify and release approximately 20 pages of the FISA Court application without redactions. Previously, the application was released in a heavily redacted form ostensibly to protect national security.

However, it quickly emerged that the redactions had nothing to do with national security. They were instead intended to save Deep State officials and key US allies from being exposed and embarrassed over the use of the Steele dossier as a justification to spy on Trump’s campaign. Fox News analyst Greg Jarrett writes:

In July, a substantial portion of the wiretap warrant applications presented to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court was declassified.  It turns out that no vital sources or methods were revealed in a way that jeopardized either national security or the FBI’s secret investigative techniques.  Instead, we learned that much of the application to spy on a Trump campaign associate, Carter Page, was based on an unverified “dossier” that was funded by Hillary Clinton’s campaign and composed by a British spy, Christopher Steele, who was fired by the FBI for lying. 

The concerns of Britain and Australia, in particular, is that the unredacted version will show how they and other key US allies were involved in the development and distribution of the unverified dossier through the Five Eyes agreement between the US, Britain, Canada, Australia and New Zealand.

Q has previously described how the Five Eyes agreement provided a mechanism for Deep State officials from the US, Britain, Australia and other Five Eyes nations to collude in fabricating the Steele dossier as an “insurance policy” in case Trump won the election.

An incriminating August 15, 2016 email from FBI counterintelligence agent Peter Strzok to an FBI legal counsel, Lisa Page, revealed he was part of a Deep State scheme to concoct an “insurance policy” in case Trump won the election – the Steele Dossier was its vital element:  

I want to believe the path you threw out for consideration in Andy’s office that there’s no way he gets elected — but I’m afraid we can’t take that risk. It’s like an insurance policy in the unlikely event you die before you’re 40….

As a Q post will shortly reveal, Britain, in particular, is very concerned that the unredacted 20 pages from the June 2017 FISA application will show that it, rather than Russia, actually colluded with a Presidential campaign to affect the outcome of the 2016 election. But rather than Russia colluding with the Trump campaign, the real collusion was between Britain and the Hillary Clinton’s Presidential campaign.

It’s important to point out that classifying government documents with the purpose of protecting public officials from embarrassment or to hide lawlessness is actually a crime under Executive Order 13526 issued by President Barack Obama in 2009, as section 1.7 clearly states:

Sec 1.7. Classification Prohibitions and Limitations. (a) In no case shall information be classified, continue to be maintained as classified, or fail to be declassified in order to:

(1) conceal violations of law, inefficiency, or administrative error;

(2) prevent embarrassment to a person, organization, or agency;

(3) restrain competition; or

(4) prevent or delay the release of information that does not require protection in the interest of the national security.”

Here is the first part of tweet issued by President Trump on September 21 relating to US allies calling him to discuss the FISA Court application:

Trump has acknowledged here that “Key Allies’ called to ask not to release”, and that there was a connection to the Robert Mueller Russia investigation, which was authorized by one of the signatories of the June 2017 FISA Court application, the current Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein.

QAnon followed Trump’s two-part September 21 tweet with a post on the same day identifying the key allies as Britain and Australia, which are particularly concerned about declassifying the redacted version of the June 2017 FISA Court application.

Significantly, Q identifies how Britain and Australia (UK/AUS) assisted the Obama White House in developing the “insurance policy” by facilitating the Steele dossier and its passage through the US political and intelligence systems. This helps explain why Deep State representatives from key allies (Britain and Australia) called Trump to get him to reverse his decision to declassify the 20 redacted pages from the June 2017 FISA Court application.

Apparently, Britain and Australia are most concerned about the fallout for the Mueller investigation if the person who authorized it had signed off on a FISA Court application that was misleading, if not unlawful. The release of the 20 redacted pages would apparently lead to Rosenstein having to either recuse himself from the Mueller investigation or even resign.

This is exemplified in a September 10 post by Q where Rosenstein’s role in signing off on the 2016 FISA application on the basis of false intelligence data provided by Britain and Australia to the Obama Administration will force his resignation/recusal and/or removal of Rosenstein:

Q !!mG7VJxZNCI No.207
Sep 10 2018 12:41:01 (EST)

DECLAS OF FISA WILL INITIATE THE RESIGNATION/RECUSAL AND/OR REMOVAL OF ROD ROSENSTEIN.
DECLAS OF FISA WILL INITIATE THE ‘AWARENESS’ THAT ALL SIGNERS WILL BE [CURRENTLY] UNDER INVESTIGATION.
DECLAS OF FISA WILL FACTUALLY DEMONSTRATE WITHOUT ARGUMENT THE US GOVERNMENT, UNDER HUSSEIN, KNOWINGLY, PRESENTED FALSE EVIDENCE TO FISC IN AN EFFORT TO OBTAIN ‘LEGAL’ US INTELLIGENCE ‘UMBRELLA’ SURV OF POTUS [IDEN TARGET] FOR THE SOLE PURPOSE OF INFLUENCING THE 2016 ELECTION OF THE PRESIDENCY [NOT RUSSIA BUT HUSSEIN/HRC – PROJECTION] + SAFEGUARD AGAINST POSSIBLE LOSS OF POWER [FIREWALLS].
USE OF BACKCHANNEL SURV / SPY INSERTION [BODY 1, 2, AND 5] BY UK/AUS [PRIMARY] ACTIVATED UNDER DIR BRENNAN DIR CLAPPER W/ PDB REGULAR UPDATES + [LIVE STREAMING] WH HUSSEIN NON-OVAL [SITUATION ROOM] COORDINATION.
FISA [FULL] BRINGS DOWN THE HOUSE [WH].
Q

Q’s post mentions that all that signed off on the FISA document are currently under investigation by a Grand Jury, and that the Obama administration’s role, along with that of Britain and Australia will be exposed.

Q’s final comment that full declassification of the FISA document will bring down the house, alludes to Rosenstein’s forced resignation/recusal/removal will trigger the House of Cards built by the Deep State in moving forward with developing an “insurance policy” to undermine/subvert the Trump administration.

Indeed, in a  September 18 post, Q has said that Rosenstein’s time is up and he will have to resign or be sacked as described in a linked article by Greg Jarrett:

Q !!mG7VJxZNCI No.263
Sep 18 2018 22:15:05 (EST)

http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2018/09/18/gregg-jarrett-if-rod-rosenstein-defies-trumps-order-to-declassify-documents-should-be-fired.html
Goodbye, Mr. Rosenstein.
Q

Trump went on in part two of his September 21 tweet to describe how he had turned the request of the key US allies (Britain and Australia) over to the Inspector General of the Department of Justice (Michael Horowitz) for a final review.

The two-part tweet is very significant since just over a day earlier, Q had posted that Deep State officials in Britain and Washington DC were in a panic over the prospect of the release of the unredacted version of the FISA application document.

Here’s what Q posted on September 19:

Q !!mG7VJxZNCI ID: 72b088 No.3093117
Sep 19 2018 18:45:07 (EST)

PANIC IN UK
PANIC IN DC
PANIC IN UK
PANIC IN DC
Q

It’s important to note that the above Q post appeared roughly 36 hours before Trump’s two-part tweet acknowledging that he had been speaking with key US allies over the FISA Court document release. Such conversations between Heads of State/Government are highly classified and restricted to a very few. Only those with very senior level access in the Trump White House would have known about the conversations and their contents.

Q has demonstrated that they knew of the conversations, and were cleared to reveal the tone of Trump’s conversations with Britain, Australia and other key allies as “panic” over the declassification of the twenty pages of the June 2017 FISA Court application.

This is an extraordinary public confirmation that Q is closely associated with the Trump administration, and that Trump and Q actually coordinated in their respective releases of tweets and posts.

In fact, the coordination between Trump’s tweets and Q posts has been tracked by anonymous users and show a close correlation as Q acknowledged in the following post:

Trump’s September 21 two-part tweet only adds to a compelling set of information showing that Q is working with the Trump administration and is not a LARP [Live Action Role Play] or disinformation campaign as claimed by some critics.

Trump’s tweets and Q posts reveal that the Deep State is in a panic because the declassification of the 20 redacted pages of the June 2017 FISA court application will lead, at the very least, to the recusal of Rod Rosenstein from the Trump Russia investigation, and even his resignation as Q has predicted.

Furthermore, the impending release of the 20 redacted pages will almost certainly lead to Grand Jury indictments of all US officials involved in the “insurance policy” concocted by the Deep State to undermine and/or subvert the incoming Trump administration.

Exposure and unraveling of the Deep State’s “insurance policy” to subvert the Trump incoming administration, will directly impact the Mueller investigation of Trump Russia ties, and likely lead to its demise.

The ramifications of the above developments are especially pertinent to Q’s repeated posts referring to over 50,000 sealed Federal court cases, the vast majority of which involved sealed indictments against Deep State officials.

As discussed in a previous article, it is likely that many indicted public officials will be tried in military courts for subversion, as defined under the rules of the Uniform Code of Military Justice. Indeed, Rosenstein and others involved in the “insurance policy” may find themselves in military trials for subversion.

This would of course be a great concern to Deep State officials from Britain, Australia, Canada and New Zealand that assisted in the concoction of the Steele dossier, and channeling it through the US intelligence and judicial systems in a way to subvert the Trump administration.

The crimes committed by Deep State officials that is about to be exposed, and tried in civilian and military courts, according to Q’s information, is going to be breathtaking. In addition to subversion of an incoming Presidential administration, Q has previously posted about systemic human rights abuses and corruption on a global level; pedophile rings involving senior politicians exploiting children; Satanic practices used to control powerful global elites and the Vatican; and even a cover up of secret space programs and extraterrestrial life.

Trump’s two-part September 21 tweet appears to be part of a series of end game moves between the Trump Administration and the Deep State, which is getting major media attention as the battle over declassifying the FISA Court Application redactions comes to a climax.

In a stunning development late on Friday night, articles by major media outlets began appearing exposing comments by Rod Rosenstein in 2017 to secretly record conversations with Donald Trump in order to invoke the 25th Amendment, whereby Cabinet officials could remove hm from the Presidency.

The fallout from this negative media coverage will all but certainly lead to Rosenstein’s resignation, recusal and/or removal just as Q predicted. Q succinctly expresses what to expect in the days ahead regarding declassification (DECLAS) and redaction (REDACT) of the 2017 FISA Court Application:

Q !!mG7VJxZNCI No.265
Sep 19 2018 17:19:53 (EST)

[RR] attempts to stall DECLAS and/or REDACT have FAILED.
Got popcorn?
Enjoy the show.
Q

© Michael E. Salla, Ph.D. Copyright Notice

[9/22/18 – Correction –  President Trump’s September 17, 2018 Presidential Directive authorized the declassification of 20 redacted pages from a FISA Court Application made in June 2017, and not June 2016 as previously written. The June 2017 application was the fourth granted in a series that began in October 2016, which had to renewed every 90 days. Renewal applications were granted in January, April and July 2017. Thanks to an anonymous reader for pointing out the error]  

Further Reading

In a US Senate Confirmation hearing held on September 5, Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh was asked a series of questions that point to future cases involving the legality of military justice being used against U.S citizens. The military intelligence group QAnon has linked the questioning to an Executive Order by President Donald Trump that creates a legal basis for military justice being used against Deep State officials.

In post 2093, QAnon wrote the following:

The linked Youtube video, which mysteriously became unavailable (blocked?), showed Senator Lindsay Graham asking Judge Kavanaugh about the legality of the military justice system being used against U.S. citizens who have been colluding with enemy forces. Kavanaugh explained how the Supreme Court has in the past created legal precedents for military justice being applied in such a way.

QAnon referred to Trump’s Executive Order issued on December 21, 2017 creating a “national emergency” in the US due to “serious human rights abuse and corruption around the world”. The Executive Order makes clear that all involved in such abuses constitute an “unusual and extraordinary threat” to U.S. national security:

I, DONALD J. TRUMP, President of the United States of America, find that the prevalence and severity of human rights abuse and corruption that have their source, in whole or in substantial part, outside the United States, such as those committed or directed by persons listed in the Annex to this order, have reached such scope and gravity that they threaten the stability of international political and economic systems…The United States seeks to impose tangible and significant consequences on those who commit serious human rights abuse or engage in corruption, as well as to protect the financial system of the United States from abuse by these same persons.

I therefore determine that serious human rights abuse and corruption around the world constitute an unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security, foreign policy, and economy of the United States, and I hereby declare a national emergency to deal with that threat.

In addition to blocking the financial assets of all that are linked to such abuses, the Executive Order justifies the military justice system being used against all individuals, including US public officials, that participate in subversive acts at a time of a “national emergency”.

In post 1926, QAnon explicitly linked Trump’s Executive Order with acts of subversion. QAnon begins the post as follows:

Q !!mG7VJxZNCI No.168
Aug 19 2018 14:05:47 (EST)

[Cause]
Define ‘Subversion’.
The act of subverting : the state of being subverted; especially : a systematic attempt to overthrow or undermine a government or political system by persons working secretly from within?
[Effect]
https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/executive-order-blocking-property-persons-involved-serious-human-rights-abuse-corruption/

QAnon is pointing out that U.S. public officials, both former and present, who are linked to subversive acts can have their financial assets frozen as stipulated by the December 21, 2017 Executive Order.

An example of subversion is an incriminating August 15, 2016 text by FBI counterintelligence agent, Peter Strzok, which explicitly states to another FBI official, Lisa Page, that an “insurance plan” had been developed by the Deep State to prevent Donald Trump from assuming or fulfilling the office of the President:

I want to believe the path you threw out for consideration in Andy’s office that there’s no way he gets elected — but I’m afraid we can’t take that risk. It’s like an insurance policy in the unlikely event you die before you’re 40….

The roles of Strzok and other officials in developing an insurance plan through the concocted “Steele Dossier” used in gaining FISA Court warrants is currently under investigation by the House Intelligence and Judiciary committees.  

It is what QAnon went on to say in post 1926, which raises the possibility that the military justice system is going to be used against public officials accused of subversion against the incoming Trump administration.

QAnon linked and quoted from Trump’s March 1, “2018 Amendments to the Manual for Courts-Martial”:  

Sec. 12. In accordance with Article 33 of the UCMJ, as amended by section 5204 of the MJA, the Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the Secretary of Homeland Security, will issue nonbinding guidance regarding factors that commanders, convening authorities, staff judge advocates, and judge advocates should take into account when exercising their duties with respect to the disposition of charges and specifications in the interest of justice and discipline under Articles 30 and 34 of the UCMJ. That guidance will take into account, with appropriate consideration of military requirements, the principles contained in official guidance of the Attorney General to attorneys for the Federal Government with respect to the disposition of Federal criminal cases in accordance with the principle of fair and evenhanded administration of Federal criminal law.

QAnon is here saying that the military justice system will work with U.S. Attorneys, such as Utah’s John Huber, in investigating and prosecuting criminal cases brought against individuals accused of subversion and/or linked to the national security threat posed by “serious human rights abuse and corruption around the world”.

In post 1926, QAnon next referred to public and corporate officials that have been removed from office, alluding to secret indictments involving them, and the construction of new facilities at Guantanamo military prison for the most dangerous or recalcitrant officials.

+ FBI personnel removal
+ DOJ personnel removal
+ C_A personnel removal
+ State personnel removal
+ WH personnel removal
+ House personnel removal
+ Senate personnel removal
+ Chair/CEO/VP removal
+ MIL budget (largest in our history).
+ MIL presence around POTUS
+ 45,000 sealed indictments
https://www.military.com/daily-news/2018/03/28/when-it-comes-guantanamo-trump-truly-builder-chief.html
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2017/feb/23/trump-revives-private-prison-program-doj-obama-administration-end
http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2018/03/31/turley-sessions-using-utah-federal-prosecutor-much-better-trump-2nd-special-counsel/
Nothing to See Here.
Q

What makes QAnon’s post particularly significant is the existence of the “+45,000 sealed indictments” which involve criminal charges against Deep State officials accused of subversion and/or “serious human rights abuse and corruption around the world”.

As I have shown in a previous article, the number of sealed criminal cases is extraordinarily high when compared to earlier years, and that a majority of the more than 50,000 sealed cases do involve indictments against Deep State officials.

From QAnon’s recent posts, it is becoming clearer that some of the indictments involve Deep State officials such as Strzok being charged with subversion, and being tried in military courts.

Finally, in post 2093, QAnon points to Hillary Clinton (aka HRC) being in a panic suggesting that she is also likely to be subjected to military justice for both subversion and involvement in “serious human rights abuse and corruption around the world”.

Since October 28, 2017, QAnon has been dropping breadcrumbs about human rights abuses and corruption by Deep State officials that have been subjected to secret grand jury investigations and indictments. The latest series of posts suggest that there is a definite countdown to when the secret indictments will be unsealed, and that the subsequent trials will involve some former public officials being subjected to military justice  through Courts-Martial rather than Military Tribunals as previously thought.

The general public will learn for the first time the true extent of the criminal acts of Deep State officials when it comes to human rights abuses, corruption around the world, and the effort to subvert the incoming Trump administration. QAnon’s breadcrumbs only give a bare outline of facts that will deeply shock the general public as documentary evidence is publicly released for impending criminal and military trials.

As to when the sealed indictments will be unsealed, it’s worth noting that the reform to the “2018 Amendments to the Manual for Courts-Martial” will take effect on January 1, 2019. Senator Graham’s line of questioning of Judge Kavanaugh suggests that the use of the military justice system against U.S. civilians is likely to be one of the legal issues that the new addition to the Supreme Court will be soon adjudicating.

One of the most significant effects of the looming criminal trials in civilian and military courts of Deep State officials is how all this will impact on a decades-long policy of suppressing the public release of advanced technologies associated with secret space programs, one of which  QAnon recently credited with shooting down a missile involved in a false flag attack on Hawaii.

In addition, over 5,700 patent applications that could revolutionize the transportation and medical industries, have been held up and classified due to national security orders by Deep State officials. Much more will likely be also revealed about the September 11 false flag attack, the Kennedy assassinations, the hidden history of Antarctica, and the truth about extraterrestrial life.

© Michael E. Salla, Ph.D. Copyright Notice

Further Reading

President Trump’s “Make America Great Again” rally in Tampa, Florida on July 31 saw many attendees bearing QAnon shirts and signs, and even had the President approvingly point to someone carrying a QAnon sign. This led to multiple mainstream media (MSM) stories later attacking the QAnon movement. Rather than putting a stop to the rapidly growing movement, the MSM attacks are instead putting QAnon on the radar of millions more Americans.

All this was occurring at the same time as researchers found an important link between QAnon’s tripcodes and lists of books, some of which deal with the topic of “exopolitics” – broadly defined as the political implications of extraterrestrial life. Is this a harbinger that future Q drops will deal with extraterrestrial disclosure and the control groups that have kept all this secret from Americans for decades?

First let’s begin with the Trump rally where QAnon members were prominent in the crowd and Trump approvingly acknowledged them as evidence in a short video featuring Trump pointing directly at someone holding a QAnon sign.

A question about QAnon was even directed to Sarah Huckabee Sanders, the White House Press Spokeperson.

QAnon listed in multiple posts, many of the subsequent MSM article attacking QAnon supporters using terms such as “outlandish”, “fringe conspiracy”, and even “deranged conspiracy cult” as exemplified in his/her August 2 post (#1797):

Many of the MSM stories skeptically covered some of QAnon claims such as the Clintons and Democratic Party being secretly dominated by pedophile groups; that George Soros is manipulating domestic U.S. groups to promote political violence; that the Rothschild family is at the apex of a global Satanic network; and of course that the Russia collusion charge was an insurance policy contrived by the Deep State operatives with the help of Britain’s MI6 and other Five Eyes intelligence partners in case Trump won the 2016 election.

The result that emerges from the Trump Tampa rally is that QAnon has now gone mainstream and has reached a critical threshold in terms of many millions of Americans learning about it.

What makes the rapid growth of the QAnon movement significant, despite negative mainstream media coverage, is that QAnon has now gained a mainstream platform for reaching millions of Americans who for the first time will be exposed to intelligence data that is highly classified.

According to several researchers, QAnon has dropped clues about the future direction of the intelligence dumps through the specific tripcodes that have been chosen. Rather than QAnon’s tripcodes being randomly chosen sequences of numbers and letters used for a temporary period for identification purposes on the 4chan and 8chan posting boards, it has been shown that these are references to lists of books on Googlebooks.

The following video posted on July 22 shows how QAnon’s tripcodes have referred to a series of ground breaking books dealing with a range of topics that have been covered in Q posts:

In a later July 29 article titled, “EVERY TripCode & UserID used by Q Points to a Book”, the author writes:

Q has used 11 TripCodes, and 1100 UserID’s. EVERY one of them points to a book when you search them in Google Books. Some are even pointing to specific pages within that book.

Sure enough, when one goes to the Google Books website and enter different tripcodes used by QAnon, one gets a list of books. The writer includes the following examples:

1 Ramtha, Last Waltz of the Tyrants, the Prophecy REVISITED
Author: Ramtha
Found: TripCode CbboFOtcZs
Used: 376 times

2 Alraune
Author: Hanns Heinz Ewers
Found: TripCode 4pRcUA0lBE
Used: 106 times

“I Love Learning; I Hate School”: An Anthropology of College
Author: Susan D. Blum
Found: TripCode 2jsTvXXmXs
Used: 9 times

Barbelo: The Story of Jesus Christ
Author: Riaan Booysen
Found: TripCode xowAT4Z3VQ
Used: 429 times

Behold a Pale Horse
Author: William Cooper
Found: TripCode UW.yye1fxo
Used: 620 times
Notes: Interview with Bill Cooper

The above books cover a wide range of conspiracy related topics, in particular William Cooper’s Behold a Pale Horse (1991) comes up a staggering 620 times when entering QAnon’s trip codes and ID’s. Behold a Pale Horse is a classic when it comes to the topic of a government/military coverup of extraterrestrial life, which falls under the rubric of “exopolitics”.

In 1989, Cooper became one of the first whistleblowers to come forward to reveal what he had seen in classified U.S. Navy intelligence files when he served on the briefing team for the Commander of the Pacific Fleet. Perhaps most importantly for QAnon readers, he provided some pretty detailed information about the Illuminati (Deep State) and their connection to ruling bloodline families and Satanism.

Of particular interest to me was the tripcode used by QAnon from November 9 to December 15, 2017 (!ITPb.qbhqo) which included my first exopolitics book in page one of the listed books as illustrated below (highlighted by red bar).

On page 3 of the same tripcode, another one of my exopolitics books is listed: Galactic Diplomacy: Getting to Yes with ET.

Based on tripcodes, the conclusion that can be reached is that QAnon is signaling that in the future important disclosures about extraterrestrial life are going to be made, and that it behooves people to get up to speed with what the available “exopolitics” literature is telling us.

The Exopolitics and Galactic Diplomacy books were respectively published in 2004 and 2013. I recommend both of these, along with my more recent Secret Space Programs series as critical for any wanting to understand the decades long cover up of extraterrestrial life and technology.

As the QAnon movement grows rapidly with the mainstream media fixation on discrediting Q’s information only serving to rapidly accelerate Q’s popularity, we can get an idea of the direction of future Q drops by the tripcodes and ID’s that have been used, and what shows up on the Google Books listings for these.

© Michael E. Salla, Ph.D. Copyright Notice

Further Reading

The military intelligence source QAnon has dropped another bombshell with the latest round of leaked classified information, which has been released with the tacit approval of the Trump White House. QAnon has revealed that contrary to popular perception and an ongoing criminal investigation led by Special Counsel Robert Mueller, it was senior government officials from the United Kingdom, rather than Russia, that interfered in the 2016 U.S. Presidential Elections.

QAnon has in previous articles been shown to be linked to a faction of U.S. military intelligence that recruited Trump to run for the U.S. Presidency in 2015. While the Deep State has leaking classified information to destabilize the Trump administration, Trump has responded in kind by authorizing QAnon to leak classified information that exposes the Deep State and its nefarious global activities.

On July 25 (post 1700), QAnon released the bombshell information by first posing a leading question and then went on to list different mechanisms by which this interference was attempted:

What if the UK gov worked hand-in-hand w/ the Hussein admin to sabotage the 2016 election?
Data collection.
Voice.
Video.
Bugging.
Creation of fake intel dossier using ex spy.
Co-sponsor insurance policy re: POTUS election. Co-sponsor insurance policy re: POTUS election.

What makes the scenario described by QAnon plausible is the nature of the Five Eyes agreement which makes it possible for the United Kingdom to gather intelligence on U.S. citizens and organizations, and then pass this on to U.S. officials. This practice is widely known as the means by which Five Eyes countries (U.S., Britain, Canada, Australia and New Zealand) routinely circumvent domestic laws preventing intelligence agencies spying on their own national citizens without due legal process.

While the Five Eyes agreement makes it possible for information gathered by partner intelligence agencies to be shared through official channels, QAnon has revealed that this sharing can also be achieved unofficially. QAnon has pointed out that former government officials with the right security clearance, can get access to intelligence information when traveling to another Five Eyes country, and no official record is kept.

On May 8 (post 1320), QAnon referred to Hillary Clinton traveling to New Zealand and gaining access to U.S. Intelligence files through the Five Eyes system.

Why is HRC in NZ?
Is NZ part of 5 Eyes?
Why is that relevant?
Suicide watch.
Q

Former or serving officials can subsequently share or leak this information through unofficial means, as Congressman Devin Nunes discovered when reviewing intelligence data used to launch the FBI investigation into the 2016 Trump campaign:

Normally, intelligence passed on from a member of the “Five Eyes” alliance — Australia, Canada, New Zealand, the U.K., and the U.S. — to another member comes through an official channel for intelligence sharing.

However, Nunes, upon reviewing the document that formally launched the FBI’s investigation, said there was no intelligence shared through that official channel, meaning that the intelligence was shared through unofficial means.

QAnon is revealing that a number of US officials traveled to Britain to get access to Five Eyes intelligence information on the Trump Presidential campaign, which was then used to sabotage his campaign through a contrived narrative of Trump being secretly manipulated by Russia. This is consistent with what is known about the Christopher Steele Dossier which was produced through collaboration between elements of the British intelligence community and Obama administration officials.

QAnon listed some of the 32 U.S. officials that were part of this collective effort to derail the 2016 election regardless of the will of American voters:

  1. [Peter Strozk]
    LP. [Lisa Page]
    No Name. [John McCain]
    [James] Clapper.
    [John] Brennan.
    [Susan] Rice.
    LL. [Loretta Lynch]
    HRC. [Hillary Rodham Clinton]
    BC. [Bill Clinton]
    Hussein. [President Obama]
    +22

QAnon has pointed out in particular that trips to London by John McCain, Peter Strozk and Lisa Page were done in order to gain intelligence data on the Trump campaign through the Five Eyes system, without leaving a paper trail.

It is more than coincidental that on July 23, two days prior to QAnon’s above post, it was announced at a White House Press Conference that several former Obama administration officials, several of whom QAnon included in the above list, may have their security clearances revoked:

Sanders said the administration is reviewing clearances for former CIA director John Brennan, former FBI director director James Comey, former national intelligence director James Clapper, former CIA director Michael Hayden, former national security adviser Susan Rice and former deputy FBI director Andrew McCabe.

What gives plausibility to the above list of officials is the recent admission by James Clapper, former Director of National Intelligence, that President Obama authorized spying on the Trump Presidential campaign to investigate Russian collusion claims.

QAnon went on to describe how the Obama administration, along with the British government, actively colluded in framing Russia:

What if intel masked penetration(s) to frame Russia?
Crowdstrike?
Servers.
SR. [Seth Rich]
JA. [Julian Assange]
Why does the UK gov desperately want JA?
Think source files.
The more you know.
Q

QAnon is here referring to Julian Assange’s knowledge that Seth Rich had access to Democratic National Committee servers, and was the real source for the files that were passed on to Wikileaks, not Russia as recently claimed by the Mueller indictment of 12 Russian intelligence officers

Clearly these are explosive claims, some of which are currently being investigated by U.S. Attorney John Huber with the assistance of the Inspector General of the U.S. Department of Justice. It is not known when Huber and the Inspector General will release their findings and begin prosecutions of those that have identified in thousands of sealed indictments.

However, what QAnon’s information does clearly reveal is the thinking behind the Trump administration when it comes to dealing with historic allies such as the United Kingdom, who Trump and his military intelligence advisors believe played a key role in manufacturing the Russia collusion claims to subvert his Presidency.

QAnon’s revelation helps explain Trump’s unprecedented recent intervention in British politics where he supported a hard Brexit strategy for leaving the European Union, and undermined Prime Minister Theresa May’s Brexit policy. More startling was Trump’s endorsement of former British Foreign Secretary, Boris Johnson, who the President said would make an excellent Prime Minister.

Perhaps even more telling was Trump’s behavior when meeting with Queen Elizabeth II. He broke Royal protocols in a manner that led some to claim that the Deep State/International Cabal was signaling its surrender to Trump.

It has long been known that Britain is a key player in the Deep State through its powerful financial institutions based in the City of London. One of the key figures in the City of London is Baron Jacob Rothschild who is the fourth Rothschild to gain the hereditary peerage established by Queen Victoria in 1885.

According to QAnon, the Rothschild family controls world wide assets of over two trillion U.S. dollars and forms the occult leadership of the Deep State, which actively practices Satanism and performs child sacrifices. The Deep State compromises aspiring politicians through pedophilia as documented in books such as The Franklin Coverup: Child Abuse, Satanism and Murder in Nebraska (1992) by a former State Senator for Nebraska, John DeCamp.

Therefore, it is very feasible that Deep State elements of the British establishment did set out to undermine the Trump Presidential campaign through manufactured evidence of Russian collusion, which was approved by President Obama and pursued by multiple officials in his administration as QAnon claims. The disturbing conclusion that emerges is that British government officials, rather than Russian intelligence officers, are most responsible for interfering in the U.S. Presidential process by contriving evidence and leaking classified information through the Five Eyes agreement.  

© Michael E. Salla, Ph.D. Copyright Notice

Further Reading